设为首页 电子邮箱 联系我们

本刊最新招聘信息请见“通知公告”!  本刊投稿系统试运行中,欢迎投稿!如投稿有问题,可直接将稿件发送至zgyy8888@163.com

 

主管单位:中华人民共和国   

国家卫生健康委员会

主办单位:中国医师协会
总编辑:
杨秋

编辑部主任:吴翔宇

邮发代号:80-528
定价:28.00元
全年:336.00元
Email:zgyy8888@163.com
电话(传真):010-64428528;
010-64456116(总编室)

                  

过刊目录

2023 年第 11 期 第 18 卷

不同心理干预方法对逆向介入治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者心理状态和认知能力及生活质量的影响研究

Impact of different psychological intervention methods  on psychological state, cognitive ability and quality of life of patients with coronary chronic total occlusion undergoing reverse intervention treatment

作者:李志颖1张立新1田园1杜昕1吴瑛2龙德勇1

英文作者:Li Zhiying1 Zhang Lixin1 Tian Yuan1 Du Xin1 Wu Ying2 Long Deyong1

单位:1首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科,北京100029;2首都医科大学护理学院,北京100069

英文单位:1Department of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing 100029 China; 2School of Nursing Capital Medical University Beijing 100069 China

关键词:冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞;心理干预;微信工具;焦虑;抑郁;生活质量

英文关键词:Coronarychronictotalocclusion;Psychologicalintervention;WeChattools;Anxiety;Depression;Qualityoflife

  • 摘要:
  • 目的    探讨不同心理干预方法对逆向介入治疗冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞(CTO)患者心理状态和认知能力及生活质量的影响。方法  选取2020年2月21日至2022年4月1日在首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科进行逆向介入治疗的150例冠状动脉CTO患者为研究对象。所有患者完全随机分为微信干预组和常规干预组,各75例。常规干预组患者住院期间接受常规心理干预;微信干预组患者接受基于微信工具的心理干预。比较2组一般资料及干预前后心理状态和认知能力及生活质量相关量表评分。结果  2组性别、年龄分布、文化程度、职业、婚姻状态、民族、医疗保险及家庭人均月收入情况差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后微信干预组焦虑自评量表、抑郁自评量表评分低于干预前和常规干预组[组间:(25±3)分比(28±4)分、(31±6)分比(35±6)分],蒙特利尔认知评估量表、简易智力状态检查量表评分高于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。2组干预后日常生活活动能力量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分比较及与本组干预前比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论  与常规心理干预方法相比,以微信为工具载体的心理干预可以更好地改善逆向介入治疗CTO患者心理健康状态。此外本方法还能提高患者的认知能力。

  • Objective  To discuss the impact of different psychological intervention Methods   on psychological state, cognitive ability and quality of life of patients with coronary chronic total occlusion(CTO) undergoing reverse intervention treatment. Methods  From February 21, 2020 to April 1, 2022, 150 patients with coronary CTO undergoing reverse interventional treatment in Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University were selected. The patients were completely randomized into WeChat intervention group and routine intervention group, with 75 cases each. The routine intervention group received routine psychological intervention during hospitalization; the WeChat intervention group received psychological intervention based on WeChat tools. The general information, psychological status, cognitive ability, and quality of life related scale scores before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results  There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, educational level, occupation, marital status, ethnicity, medical insurance, and per capita monthly income between the two groups(all P>0.05). After the intervention, scores of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale in the WeChat intervention group were lower than those before the intervention and in the routine intervention group[inter group: (25±3) vs (28±4), (31±6) vs (35±6)], and the Montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination scores were higher than those before the intervention (all P<0.05). After intervention, there were no significant differences in scores of activities of daily living scale, Pittsburgh sleep quality index between the two groups and there was no significant difference with before intervention in each group(all P>0.05). Conclusions    Compared with routine psychological intervention Methods  , psychological intervention using WeChat as a tool carrier can better improve the psychological health status of CTO patients undergoing reverse intervention treatment. In addition, this method can also improve the patient′s cognitive ability.

copyright 《中国医药》杂志编辑部
地址:北京市朝阳区安贞路2号首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院北楼二层
电话:010-64456116 传真:010-64428528 邮编:100029 Email: zgyy8888@163.com
网址:www.chinamedicinej.com 京ICP备2020043099号-3

当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱zgyy8888@163.com。







安卓


苹果

关闭